Showing posts with label faith. Show all posts
Showing posts with label faith. Show all posts

Monday, March 28, 2016

Leadership Qualities of James Nachtwey - an essay

James Nachtwey; image borrowed from Google images, all rights reserved

            Photography is an uniquely powerful tool that can be used in a myriad of ways, but when it is used to advance justice, it has the ability to change lives. Photographers working in conflict zones are not only making a statement through their images but also by their very presence in the midst of war.
For me, the strength of a photography lies in its ability to evoke a sense of humanity. If war is an attempt to negate humanity, then photography can be perceived as the opposite of war and if its used well it can be a powerful ingredient in the antidote to war. In a way, if an individual assumes the risk of placing himself in the middle of a war in order to communicate to the rest of the world what is happening, he's trying to negotiate for peace.[1]
Making a life and career out of documenting war, conflict, and any one of far too many social justice issues demands much from a person, physically, emotionally, and relationally. In order to become an impactful leader in this field requires much more than just skill and endurance. James Nachtwey is just such a photographer, exceptionally proficient and selflessly dedicated to his craft and to the issues he chooses to cover. I chose to write this paper about him because I have the utmost respect for his photographic style, his passion for justice issues, and the way he melds these two passions. He is able to combine these two passions through discipline, humility, and commitment to proximity.
            James Nachtwey was born in Massachusetts in 1948. In 1976, after attending college, he was inspired by the images he saw coming out of the Vietnam War and the American civil rights movement and decided to become a war photographer, teaching himself the craft.[2] He would work tirelessly to become the anti-war photographer he is known as today by capturing images of every major world conflict since 1981 and covering many social issues including poverty, pollution, famine, and crime. His résumé is impressive and extensive, including having been awarded the Martin Luther King, Jr. Legacy Award which "recognizes and affirms those who have made significant and tangible contributions in the areas of race relations, justice, and human rights."[3] and in 2007 he was the winner of the TED prize, which is "awarded annually to an individual with a creative, bold vision to spark global change," for his work of raising awareness about extremely drug-resistant tuberculosis.[4] He has created two photo essay books, was nominated for an Academy Award for best documentary film for the biographical documentary, War Photographer, has worked for Time as a contract photographer since 1984, was a member of Black Star, Magnum, and VII, of which he was a founding member, and is currently covering the Syrian refugee crisis.[5] He is an undeniable leader in this field and is seen as "one of the bravest and most important war photographers of our time."[6]
            To attain this level of success with his photography began with mastering the craft of photography which requires a great deal of intellect, skill, and in-depth understanding of light, lenses, and angles, to list a few. This work requires patience, discipline, and hard work. I began my journey with photography in 2001 when I started the photo program at Spokane Falls Community College. This was right before digital photography really got started which has given me an appreciation for how much work goes into learning how to create an image, understanding aperture and film speed, as well as the delicate art of developing the film and bringing an image to life in the dark room. It is not a process you can rush or cut corners with. Producing any results, especially good ones, requires methodical and repetitive steps. I am grateful I had the opportunity to work with film first as it showed me how much discipline and hard work would be required for success in this field. When I switched to digital a few years after I graduated, I enjoyed a new-found ease for creating images but it also came with a decided lack of discipline and patience with my shooting. Shooting with a film camera forces you to put more thought into the image you are creating since you won't see the images until the film is processed. It makes you stop and think about what adjustments need to be made in order to create the best image possible so that there is less work that needs to be done in the darkroom. To see any one of Nachtwey's photographs is to recognize and appreciate his ability to create technically beautiful images, the direct result of years of discipline.
            Along with his discipline in the area of camera knowledge and technical aspects of photography, Nachtwey is also dedicated and disciplined to continue working in the face of such horror and hardship, something many people cannot endure for long. The horrors they witness in order to do their job and raise awareness are unimaginable. To continually return to the battlefield, the prison, or the slum, year after year, requires an inner strength and discipline that must come from a place of intense drive and desire to continue to fight against injustice, apathy, ignorance, and fear despite assured personal cost. "To cave in would be useless. What I do is channel my feelings into my work. Any anger that I'm feeling, frustration, disbelief, grief, I try and channel it into my pictures."[7] This requires remarkable discipline.
            I am inspired by his dedication to all aspects of his craft and recognize how far I am from being that kind of photographer. While I may think that I am disciplined to create and edit images with discipline, emphasizing technical aspects and perhaps being overly critical of my own work, I know that I have not pursued the issues I am passionate about with the same discipline and drive. It is far easier to work with flowers, sunsets, or cityscapes than it is to immerse oneself in a community of people dealing with daily injustices. I have a certain amount of insecurity about my own success and/or failure and my ability to interact with people on such an intimate level as would be required for creating the kinds of images necessary for affecting change. I haven't disciplined myself to take those steps, to get out of my comfort zone, and to face the very injustices that I hope the most to spotlight through my photography. Nachtwey’s high level of discipline and dedication to all areas of his work make him a leader I can learn from in my justice work and photography. I haven't always found people in leadership to be people I find worthy of following or learning from. Many of the people I have come in contact with who would be considered leaders, particularly bosses, may have had some level of discipline but it seems to have been directed inward, toward their own success. Even when I have had the opportunity to take on a managerial position, the experience was more negative than anything else, due in part to poor leaders who never took the time to train me adequately. As a result of those experiences I have shied away from further leadership roles with my jobs, feeling ill-equipped to take on that role without positive leaders to learn from. I am learning to seek out leaders I respect and who have lessons to teach, regardless of whether I have a direct relationship with them or not. While discipline and hard work are common qualities in a leader, great leaders will possess other characteristics which set them apart.
            The quality I find to be the most admirable and important one Nachtwey possesses is his profound humility. His desire to create images that speak volumes so that he only has to say a little is admirable, particularly in a culture that encourages and celebrates celebrity, selfishness, and arrogance. As evidenced by any speech he may give, it is evident that he is not there to make a name for himself or to gain followers or fans, and that the attention and spotlight make him uncomfortable. 
The worst thing is to feel that as a photographer I am benefiting from someone else's tragedy. This idea haunts me. It is something I have to reckon with every day because I know that if I ever allow genuine compassion to be overtaken by personal ambition I will have sold my soul. The only way I can justify my role is to have respect for the other persons' predicament. The extent to which I do that is the extent to which I become accepted by the other, and to that extent I can accept myself.[8]
He is there to be a voice for the voiceless which he does eloquently, through spoken language when absolutely necessary, but even more so through the silent yet more powerful language of his photographs. Even the captions of his photos are generally short and factual, leaving the rest of the story to be told in what shines through on the paper.
I have had the privilege of seeing this type of humility also lived out in the lives of my parents who sought not to gain recognition or personal glory for anything they did but to always point towards God, his provision, and his goodness. I have learned much from their examples for which I am extremely grateful. Because of this upbringing and my faith in God, I find arrogance to be the most off-putting quality a person, especially a leader, can possess. It is the opposite of humility and is in direct contradiction to Jesus' commands in Romans 12 to not give yourself more importance or place yourself above others. I think this is partly why it is challenging for me to do any sort of self-promotion in regards to my photography, or other areas of my life, as I worry that it will seem as though I'm trying to make my photography about me and my own glorification, an idea that I strongly abhor. Many years ago I heard a pastor say that, "We were never created to have an image but to reflect one,"[9] and that phrase has stuck with me. Photography has always been a way for me to attempt to reflect the image of God through the content of my work as well as through any potential financial benefit. If I'm not using my photography, a passion gifted to me by God, to bless and benefit others in some way, then I will have succumbed to selfishness and greed, and consequently failed to reflect His image. Being able to see how Nachtwey balances confidence, rather than arrogance, and humility so expertly gives me hope for learning the same skills. Discerning how to be confident enough in my gifting to go after what I feel lead to do and still remain humble has been a challenge I have shied away from but I think I am beginning to make progress in that area, however slowly. Such is the effect of seeing the examples of good leadership.
            Not only does Nachtwey possess a great deal of humility in regards to recognition for his work, he shows much humility in actually creating the photographs. In order to produce the type of photographs he creates, he has to be someone whom other people welcome and accept into their lives often in the midst of great tragedy and hardship.
An arrogant, pushy photographer who is only there for a shot or two and then is off to the next hotspot could never make the images Nachtwey has been able to make, build the relationships he has built, nor influence the amount of change he has been able to. This speaks to his profound respect and compassion for the people he is photographing and for their situation. "I attempt to become as totally responsible to the subject as I possibly can. The act of being an outsider aiming a camera can be a violation of humanity."[10] His images are never degrading or humiliating no matter the circumstance. In watching War Photographer you can clearly see how he connects with people. He's methodical, patient, and careful, always aware of the intricacies of what is happening around him and working to capture the best shot without interfering or drawing attention to himself. He has a quiet open manner, speaking very little in the film, often only to narrate to the viewer what is or was happening. This level of humility and respect is something I aspire to and continue to strive for in all areas of my life, not just my photography. It is through this approach that real relationships can be formed and sustained and injustices can be revealed and addressed.
            James Nachtwey's photographs are also exceptional due in part to his proximity to his subjects. He gets very close to the people he is working with and because of this he is able to capture emotions and evoke feelings that images captured from a distance are incapable of doing. In the words of Robert Capa, “If your photographs aren't good enough, you're not close enough."[11] In War Photographer, there is a story told by one of Nachtwey's colleagues about a man in Indonesia who was being chased down by a murderous mob for no reason other than his ethnicity and Nachtwey was right there, running with him, eventually spending 20 minutes pleading for the mans' life before the man was eventually killed. He couldn't stop the mob but he tried.[12] Many photographers keep their distance and don't step in to save a life when given the chance. He had to be close enough to this mob and this man in order to try to stop the murder. Nachtwey is not there merely to document and to bear witness, but to also fight for justice through means other than his photography. "I have been a witness, and these pictures are my testimony. The events I have recorded should not be forgotten and must not be repeated." It is so easy to maintain a safe distance, in photography and in life, to protect oneself from harm and to avoid having to really confront injustice.
            Commitment to proximity is something I struggle with both in my life and with my photography. I'm often uncomfortable, physically and emotionally, in close proximity to others, particularly strangers, but I recognize that I'm missing out on all the good that can come from getting close with someone. Proximity encourages seeing from someone else's perspective and thereby gaining deeper understanding, greater insight and truer compassion that may otherwise be missed. To be able to fight injustice requires a commitment to proximity. Bryan Stevenson, another great leader in justice work who is the founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, a lawyer, a professor, and activist,[13] also emphasizes the importance of proximity in justice work in a talk he gave at the 2014 Justice Conference.[14] I am challenged by the examples of Nachtwey, Stevenson, and many others to confront my fears and to learn to work in closer proximity with people. I learn well by watching what other people do and how they do it and to see a brief glimpse of how Nachtwey works when he's photographing gives me ideas on how to strive to make that a greater part of who I am in my photography and justice work. Great leaders are ones who work closely with you, who are willing to put in the time and energy to see you succeed and grow, and who aren't afraid of building relationship in close proximity with you. As stated above, many of my experiences with people in leadership roles have been negative, something I think can be attributed in part to their lack of humility as well as their seeming failure to recognize the importance of building relationships based on intentional proximity.
            James Nachtwey, a man of incredible discipline, profound humility, and fearless proximity show him to be a leader in photography and also in justice work, using the former to shed light on the latter and bring about change. I chose James Nachtwey because he is a man whose work and character I greatly admire and whose passion for photography and justice issues resonate with me on a deep level. Micah 6:8 says, "What does the Lord require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly." While I do not know where his faith may or may not lie, James Nachtwey and his work epitomize these words and I can clearly see Jesus' example being lived out here. As Christians we are called to, "Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights of the poor and needy."[15] I have long dreamed of having the opportunity, confidence, and strength to use my photography to do just that. To be able to bring light to topics people may not know much about, speak through my photography for those unable to make their voices heard, and to ultimately bear witness so that these atrocities are not repeated is a goal I hope to achieve throughout my life. There is no more powerful a way to 'speak up' for someone than through the medium of photography. A speech, a painting, or a song can do a lot but a photograph can say much more than all the words, all the songs, and all the paintings combined. They truly can be worth a thousand words and have the power to influence lasting change.


To view James's work, please visit: http://www.jamesnachtwey.com/
 
References:
[1] War Photographer, directed by Christian Frei, (2001; First Run Features), DVD.
[2] James Nachtwey, Witness Photography by James Nachtwey, accessed February 27, 2016, http://jamesnachtwey.com/.

[3] "Recognizing Those Who 'Live the Legacy' of Dr. King," City of Bloomington, accessed February 18, 2016, https://bloomington.in.gov/sections/viewSection.php?section_id=557.

[4] "XDR-TB Awareness - James Nachtwey," TED, accessed February 20, 2016, https://www.ted.com/participate/ted-prize/prize-winning-wishes/xdr-tb-org.

[5] Nachtwey, Witness Photography by James Nachtwey.

[6] Christian Frei, "About James Nachtwey," War Photographer, A Film by Christian Frei, accessed February 22, 2016, http://www.war-photographer.com/en/.
[7] War Photographer, directed by Christian Frei.
[8] War Photographer, directed by Christian Frei.

[9] Pastor Will McCain, Spokane, WA.

[10] War Photographer, directed by Christian Frei.

[11] "Robert Capa American, B. Budapest 1913 - D. Indochina 1954," Magnum Photos, 2014, accessed February 27, 2016, http://www.magnumphotos.com/C.aspx?VP3=CMS3.

[12] War Photographer, directed by Christian Frei
[13] "Bryan Stevenson," EJI, accessed February 20, 2016, http://www.eji.org/BryanStevenson.

[14] Bryan Stevenson, speech, The Justice Conference, Orpheum Theater, Los Angeles, CA, 2014, https://vimeo.com/90682764.

[15] Prov 31:8-9, NIV.

Saturday, October 10, 2015

"Don't Believe Everything You Think."



To know me at all is to understand that writing is a great outlet for me. I may not talk much, let alone with the same freedom and articulation as I do in writing, but please don't ever mistake my quietness or silence for a lack of an opinion or agreement with a topic being discussed for that is rarely the case. Sometimes it just takes me a while to form the right words and put them in the correct order to get across whatever point I am attempting to make. Also, being able to write things down, those pesky thoughts that continue to bounce around inside my head demanding some sort of release, is a bit like letting the air out of a balloon, after which I can sleep peacefully again. To keep them inside is to perpetuate my own inner torture and frustration. Much of my writing is to release the discontent and disquiet in my head and heart and not to in any way claim absolute correctness, full knowledge, or expertise on any given topic. My writing is often my outward wrestling with an inner issue. This writing falls into this category. A favorite bumper sticker I once saw said, "Don't believe everything you think." I accept that challenge and I hope others do, too.
Elmina, former slave castle, Elmina, Ghana.


 Forgive me my vehemence. Or don't. But I ask you to attempt to consider these things. From my perspective. Through my clumsy impassioned attempts to articulate my understanding of aspects of my faith and the words on a page from a book I'll never wholly understand despite my continual efforts to do so. I'm no expert on the Bible (though I do attempt to know it and grow my relationship with God through its study and reading) or gun laws (of which I make no such similar claim). But I am a citizen of this earth for now. And I'm angry. Probably no surprise there. Many things make me angry. Some of it is justified. Some of it, maybe not. But really angry. Shaking, trembling furious frustrated wrecked heartbroken angry. Like when someone ignorantly and heartlessly says "She asked for it by dressing that way," or that "They should go back to where they came from." Fury.

This anger is in regards to guns & gun violence and the people responsible for the continual atrocities being committed against innocent populations all over this country. I'm not only referring to the murders who physically attack the innocents. Admittedly, I hate, despise, loathe, abhor guns. That is no secret. I find the defense of unrestricted access to deadly weapons reprehensible and nauseating.
  • "Guns don't kill people, people do."
  • "Someone wanting a gun intent on destruction will get one no matter what laws are in place so why bother?"
  • "It's my right as a citizen to own guns, according to the constitution."
  • "Give everyone guns, arm the teachers, and that will stop them."
  • "It's not about guns, its about mental illness or religious fanaticism or (insert your  excuse/who or what you blame here)."
  • "Why punish the law-abiding citizens because of a few radicals?"
  • "People kill people with their cars so why aren't people trying to take away cars?"

and numerous other arguments. These are not answers or valid arguments!! Just give up? Let them do as they please? Hell, we'll give you our blessing through our apathy and ostrich-like ignorance and just hope for the best? No! Unacceptable!! Saying mass public shooting aren't about guns is about as absurd as saying sex trafficking isn't about forced sex or rape for profit, or that immigration issues aren't about racism. Of course, there are other issues involved with these very complex issues, I'm not denying that in the least, but to take the main issue out of the conversation is nonsensical. We don't have these mass murders happening with sling-shots or bows & arrows, though there is the occasional knife attack, which doesn't result in nearly as many deaths as a gun attack. Mass shootings are being committed by people with guns. Lots of guns. Guns & bullets that kill other people. Not sling-shots, not bows & arrows. Guns. Wielded by people, predominantly men, who easily accessed these murder weapons. Far too easily. What does my neighbor or brother or whoever need an automatic or semi-automatic weapon for? And why would we think it was okay in the first place? Thank you, NRA, for your effective propaganda and tireless lobbying on behalf of your greed and self-interest.

Psych ward, Alcatraz.
I've heard your arguments. Now humor me and hear mine. I can not comprehend the ignorance or complete blindness required to completely deny that there is a problem with guns in this country. Go ahead, look up the statistics. You can blame it on mental illness or religious extremism or whatever you want to if it makes you feel better but that isn't going to change the facts. By the way, if all these people who are shooting up churches, businesses and schools are all mentally ill as is the frequent claim, true or not, why are you so eager to gun them down (see argument about arming teachers in schools to stop the threat as an example)? Does qualifying them as insane, psychopathic or sociopathic somehow justify their murder? Is that not the same rationale that made slavery acceptable? They are somehow less than so they are thereby unworthy of life? Wrong. God created man in His image and said it was good. All mankind. Worthy.

As for the weak and absurd car vs. guns argument, first of all, vehicles are primarily modes of transportation. They are purchased with the purpose of transporting people from one place to another. They are NOT purchased generally as a weapon. A gun has no other purpose than to be a weapon. It can not be used for transportation. Secondly, the laws and regulations around even being able to drive a vehicle are many. You can not just walk into the DMV and get your license without having first getting a learners permit, taking a drivers education course which generally takes several months and passing a written and driving test. If you fail, you do not get your license. You have to try again until you get it right. Then, if you are a teenager, you are still limited in your driving abilities. You can't drive with other teens in the car that aren't family members, I believe, nor can you drive late at night, for at least 6 months. These particular restrictions were not in place when I was getting my license so I may not have all that information complete and accurate. But the point is, there are multiple restrictions that govern getting a license and having a license. If you abuse this privilege, there are consequences such as getting your license taken away and on and on. Guns do not have the same restrictions on acquiring or possessing them, though there are restrictions on felons having them and some other restrictions. See the table below. Yes, it is from Wikipedia so take that with a grain of salt, but I was wanting something succinct and this is what I found. No permit required for purchase. No owner license required. No training required. Can you see my point? Can you see the absurdity of claiming vehicles are anything like guns? Guns are weapons. Vehicles are modes of transportation that, if used outside of the bounds of their intended use and by individuals under the influence of anger, alcohol, dementia, etc., can kill people. Guns, when used as they are intended to be used, kill.









(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Washington). I don't understand the 'responsible, law-abiding' gun-owners response that more laws and restrictions will only inhibit their perceived 'rights'. If you are such a law-abiding, responsible citizen, why are you so threatened by even basic restrictions such as maybe a gun-safety course, background checks, and limits on assault weapons, to pick a few? If you have done nothing wrong in the past which might prohibit you buying that gun, then you have nothing to worry about. That law-abiding, responsible citizen ought not to fear regulations that protect their rights while making it safer for the rest of us who choose not to arm ourselves. Knowing that any Dylann, Christopher, or James can purchase a gun without so much as a training course or license makes me ill. And it should not sit well with you either.

Gun violence is primarily about guns, people with guns, about unrestricted access to any kind of gun you might conceive of. It's about a population that would rather allow this uncontrolled access to deadly weapons than to even pretend to want to enforce basic laws out of, (here's that word again), fear that the government is somehow infringing upon their so called freedom, their rights as an American. Owning a gun is not a human right, yet somehow it is perceived as one, as if it's the only way to protect your family, to guarantee your freedom, independence, life, happiness. When did the constitution replace the word of God as the ultimate truth and guide to life for His followers? The 2nd amendment shouldn't trump the 6th commandment. It's about people who value their perceived right to carry a gun over the right to life, which is an actual right given to us by our Creator. It's about the hearts of a fallen and broken humanity that stubbornly rejects anything that threatens its selfish desires. It's about a population that stubbornly refuses to admit that there is a problem because, society-forbid, we actually acknowledge our complicity in these crimes by our very apathy and outright opposition to anything that seems to threaten this 'freedom'. Make no mistake, we are complicit.

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it... History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people." Dr Martin Luther King Jr.

Inscription found in the former slave fortresses in Ghana.
While I'd like to see guns disappear from this world, I don't actually see that happening and am not really advocating for that. I see no use for them in a civilian setting (no I'm not advocating a police state, either, just some of that not-so-common-anymore sense), other than hunting for food, (not for 'sport' since a sport is only when both sides know the rules and are willingly participating, but that's another conversation), or for keeping wild animals from attacking your domestic animals like on a farm. If they aren't being used in these instances and the practice involved, what other instances is there a valid use for them, outside of the military in war (again, another topic for another time)? Inanimate objects are rarely causes for real concern, though I hear those cans and bottles can be quite terrifying. ;) So if you're not running off coyotes and if you're not hunting for food or doing target practice, or possibly taking part in some sort of shooting competition, what else is there? I don't know many actual hunters or farmers but I know several people who carry or have guns. So what exactly do you intend to shoot with that gun, not being a hunter or a farmer/rancher or sportsman? That leaves humans. Animate objects. Living, breathing people. Well, at least they started out that way, before. Victims. Statistics until they are your statistic. Then, sometimes, they matter. Sometimes. Stockpiling weapons to 'protect' yourself and your family from the more often than not imagined impending assault from … whoever (probably those people from over there with different, darker skin color than you, though you may not admit it), is evidence of a fear-full spirit and mind and often underlying or blatant racist ideology. How many times do we read about someone being shot and killed because the now-murderer thought the other person had a gun and then it turns out that the now-murdered person was unarmed? Imagined threat. Far too often, this jumping, shooting at shadows, this killing of innocents. Needlessly. Death before breathing. Irreversible actions before thoughtful reactions. Fear full. We are not called to live in fear, to give in to worry.

I took you from the ends of the earth, from its farthest corners I called you. I said, ‘You are my servant’; I have chosen you and have not rejected you. So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand. “All who rage against you will surely be ashamed and disgraced; those who oppose you will be as nothing and perish. Though you search for your enemies, you will not find them. Those who wage war against you will be as nothing at all. For I am the Lord your God who takes hold of your right hand and says to you, Do not fear; I will help you." (Isaiah 41:9-13, emphasis added).

Clock remnants, Cape Coast Castle, Ghana.
Then Jesus said to his disciples: “Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat; or about your body, what you will wear. For life is more than food, and the body more than clothes. Consider the ravens: They do not sow or reap, they have no storeroom or barn; yet God feeds them. And how much more valuable you are than birds! Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to your life? Since you cannot do this very little thing, why do you worry about the rest? (Luke 12:22-26, emphasis added)

Worry gains me nothing but can cost me everything. My safety and protection isn't found in some man-made thing that only promises death to the other in exchange for my safety, but in the promises of my God. There is nothing that any human can do to me that God can't redeem, including my death. I believe that. That does NOT mean that I welcome the evil in this world into my life and act intentionally foolish. I could choose to lock myself in a bunker in order to 'protect' myself from whatever evils in the world I feared. To 'protect' myself. Out of fear. Worry. I could do that. Some people do that. Some people buy guns. For 'protection.' Out of fear. Worry. I could join the fear-full masses. Or… I, we, could actually believe what He said. Take Him at His word. Faith, trust, hope, love.

You, dear children, are from God and have overcome them, because the one who is in you is greater than the one who is in the world. They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood. (1 John 4:4-6, emphasis added)
"So do not be afraid of them, for there is nothing concealed that will not be disclosed, or hidden that will not be made known. What I tell you in the dark, speak in the daylight; what is whispered in your ear, proclaim from the roofs. Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell," (1 John 3:16-28, emphasis added).

People are too quick to say they'd kill anyone who threatened their family or sense of freedom (read sense of entitlement to everything we think we deserve as opposed to the things God has promised us if we would only believe). I get it. There is much I would do, will do, have done when people I love have come under attack. None of them physically violent, mind you. Emotions run high. It happens. Then sanity slowly returns. As professed Christians who supposedly believe the Bible to be the inspired word of God, how do we so easily run right over, dismiss, ignore the command to Not Kill? It's right there, clearly stated, in 4 small words. Thou shall not kill or in some versions, do not commit murder. Period. Full-stop. Next commandment. There are no exceptions given after this command in any of the versions I've read; no "Thou shall not kill… except when someone makes you mad, except when someone threatens you, except when you are being attacked, except when they kill your family." I've never seen that in the Holy Bible. I have seen:

You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. And if anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you. (Matt 5:38-42, emphasis added)

You have heard that it was said, ‘Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous. If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your own people, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect. (Matthew 5:43-48, emphasis added).

(Do not mistake my beliefs and convictions for any amount of perfection in any of these areas on my part. I fail more than I succeed on any of these issues.) How did we become so willing to send someone to hell on the spot and defend it by slotting it under 'self-defense'? Most assuredly, that is what you would be doing. Sending an unbelieving soul to hell. If you, as a Christian, know where your eternity lies and profess to be concerned about the souls of unbelievers, how can you be so willing to end that life in defense of your already assured eternity with Christ? You know where you're going, he probably doesn't. If your death, rather than retaliation, allows for the opportunity for the person to come to know Christ at some point in their life after your death, is that not the ultimate sacrifice? Isn't that what Jesus did? Didn't he allow Himself to be brutally murdered for all of us who had not yet come to know Him even when He could have easily avoided such a horrific death before His resurrection? Sacrifice. And didn't He call us to follow Him, to be like Him? Obedience and emulation. To give up our lives for Him? Service. Obviously, we are not Christ, but we are called to be like Christ, to lay down our lives for not only our friends but our enemies. Might 'laying down our lives' look an awful lot like not killing someone who was attacking us, our families, our man-given freedoms? Might it look like fighting for the sanctity of life, of all lives and particularly the lives the world has continually said through action and speech that they don't matter? Not just yours or your family's. All life. Might it look just a little bit like Christ?

I will not be passive nor stand idly by nor cooperate. No, I don't think guns as inanimate objects are evil. The evil lies in the hearts and minds of people who ignore God's word. I don't own a gun, obviously, but if I did and if my giving it up meant that another life might be prolonged because of that, regardless of what might (never) happen to me, that's a no-brainer. No question about it. Give it up. Especially in light of the Gospel. Especially in light of His promises. There is no material possession I have that I wouldn't get rid of if doing so might mean the preservation of another's life. My TV. My camera…ouch. My internet access. Pick anything. Is there anything more precious to you than another life? Than the life of your child? Your spouse? Your sibling? Your parent? Your friend? Here's a tough one… that stranger or your neighbor who we're supposed to love in the same way we love ourselves? Owning a gun ought not to be more precious than these lives. Than your life. So why are we as a society so afraid of both the imagined attacker and limiting access to the very same threat we are so afraid of? It makes no sense. Can we not see the absurdity? My life is not made free by guns. Guns aren't going to keep me safe. I don't have the answer and don't pretend to know it all or refute these arguments sufficiently. And I don't know much. Boy, I'd be sitting pretty if I did! But denying that there is a problem, refusing to enforce the laws that are in place, enacting basic restrictions, and ignoring God's word on the matter will only result in more unnecessary premature deaths. How much longer will you be complicit, with or without a gun to your name? 

He came to set the captives free. All of us. Captive. Can be free. From fear. From worry. To love. To live.

Slave quarters, Elmina Castle, Ghana.